Author David W. Daniels shares a true story from one of his books that illustrates what happens when we don't teach our children how to understand some of the unfamiliar words in the King James Bible. Don't settle for a modern corruption of what God actually said!

A small sampling of verse comparisons between the KJV and NIV.

Why are people so sloppy about the very words of God? The Creator and Sustainer of the universe has lowered Himself to give us His rules and regulations, His principles and promises, His blessings and cursings. They are all there in one holy Book. The King James Bible.

Any bible but the KJV...

Video transcript - What should you do if your church moves away from the King James Bible? Should you leave?

Is it possible one of the two pillars supporting the modern, billion-dollar Bible industry is a counterfeit?

God promised to preserve his WORDS, not just his ideas. See how clear he made that.

What if there really ARE mistakes in the King James Bible?

HIstory shows that God revealed Himself to man in one language at a time. Those were then translated. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

One third of the nations in the world speak English either as a first or second language. God has decided to put His precious words for us in one language for both the Old and New Testaments. And He did this around 1611. God placed His riches into this language which has become universal.

Opponents of the King James Version like to say that there is an error in the text because Jesus' words "For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory forever. Amen" are found in Matthew but not in Luke.

Video transcript - Is being King James Only a crazy, extreme position? How should you handle people's scorn?

Aren't there archaic words in the Bible needing modern translation?

"Does the AV Bible (King James Version) contain archaic words? Certainly," says author Laurance Vance in his recent book, "Archaic Words and the Authorized Version."

Look what changes when you trust the KJV - your 'attitude' and your 'confidence.'

Dr. Frank Logsdon, project member of the translation committee for the New American Standard Version (NASB), has denounced his work on that Bible and urged all Christians to return to the Authorized Version, commonly known as the King James Bible.

Chick's stand for the King James Version as the preserved Words of God created a barrage of outrage as well as legitimate inquiries.

Are there good reasons why we should be concerned about the proliferation of Bible versions, or is it "much ado about nothing?"

After deciding that the King James Bible is the only perfectly preserved Word of God, what do you do with the old English words which you don't understand?

What happens when a pastor reads the Bible, but a child finds his own Bible says something different? The result does not build faith.

15 Bibles? You're going to have "interpretations" - people's private commentaries - not "translations."

Is your bible the perfect word of God?

Excerpt from chapter 9 of "Understandable History of the Bible" by Samuel C. Gipp.

Does the King James Bible say "Passover" in Acts 12:4?

Do you think the Lord cared enough about His holy words to preserve them in a book His own children can read and believe today?

Examples of verses that should show Jesus divinity, but have been watered down in modern Bibles. Does your Bible change the great prophecies of Jesus, only to use wording that suggests he had a beginning and is not eternal? If so, buy a new one.

Video transcript - By removing a single word, many Bibles record Jesus as lying to his brothers. How can He then be the perfect sacrifice for sin?

Modern scholars argue that we should dump the KJV, and it's Classical English, for an "easier-to-read" Bible. But what if the modern Bibles change important doctrines by removing the Classical English words that tell the reader exactly what God wants him or her to know?

How can you say the Catholic Church hid the Bible, when the first printed Bible (Gutenberg's) was a Roman Catholic Bible?

No, but that doesn't mean that God didn't guide them. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

Why the King James translators rejected the Apocrypha, placing it BETWEEN the testaments, not in them.

Be careful! Your Bible may not say so, opening the door to infant baptism. What does your Bible say?

The meaning has changed. To "replenish" means to fill. Adam and Eve were told only to "fill" the earth, not "refill" it.

It has gotten so weird in the last 150 years that in order to say that you believe in the Bible, you have to say, "I believe in the verbal, plenary, infallible, inerrancy of the original autographs."

If you trust text critics, the original gospel had no bodily resurrection! So why trust them?

There was no such region as 'Palestine' when the Bible was written. Attempting to 'modernize' the Bible leads to confusion.

The Jews rejected it as part of their Scripture (the Old Testament). But the push continues to add it to the KJV.

The NKJV is not a revision of the King James Bible at all. There is a subtle and deadly poison injected into the NKJV: it changes the meaning of God's words and it lifts up other texts that disagree with the King James

Riplinger points out that the new versions remove Jesus Christ because, "The religions of the world believe that ‘god' created all things but not by Jesus Christ."

Are the Scriptures just the "ideas" of God, or are they the very WORDS of God? You decide!

The fascinating history of the "Gunpowder Plot" which was supposed to prevent the production of the English Bible authorized by King James.

God has preserved His words through the broad flow of history in certain specific languages: Hebrew, Greek, Old Latin and English. Other languages have the blessed opportunity to follow what God has revealed and translate it into their languages.

There have only been two modifications of the King James Bible. Find out what they are.

Careful examination of early editions of the King James Bible show corrections of spelling and printer's errors, but no true revision.

Jesus said that a man would be known by his fruits. Apparently this also applies to Bibles.

The Textus Receptus didn't appear until 1633 so how can the King James Bible, which was translated in 1611, be translated from it?

There are no mistakes in the KJV

It's easy to see the change in people when they begin reading God's preserved words, the King James Bible

Video transcript - Are those who read only the King James stupid and uneducated?

1 John 5:7 belongs in the King James Bible and was preserved by faithful Christians. But the passage was removed from many Greek manuscripts, because of the problems it seemed to cause.

"Did God really preserve His Word for us today?" This question is central to all Bible version arguments.

Isn't Isaiah 53:4 a mistranslation? Shouldn't "grief" and "sorrows" have been translated "pain" and "suffering?"

By putting the words into the footnotes, publishers make the reader think 1) they did not really belong in the Bible and 2) they are not really important.

Just look at the differences between the KJV and the NIV.

Do you see a difference between these two Bible versions?

Are the accusers right that it is translated wrong? Or is this just one more lie Satan has cooked up about the KJV?

Are only the originals inspired, or did God preserve a completely accurate Bible text for us?

Author David W Daniels refutes King James Bible translation errors discussed on a radio show by Dr. Robert A Morey.

A recent issue of a national Christian magazine carried an article about a young man who lost faith in the Bible while in Bible school and now considers himself a "happy agnostic."

From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.- Isn't 'Easter' in Acts 12:4 a mistranslation of the word 'pascha' and should it be translated as 'passover'?

Publishers have changed the notes in the Scofield Bible until it no longer should carry his name. It carries notes he NEVER wrote

A famous occultist reveals how the King James Bible is hindering the New World Order.

For over 300 years, it was not only the standard for God's word in English, but it also standardized the English language.

Gregory Bruner found himself in a Florida prison, serving a ten-year sentence for manslaughter. But he wasn't the same man that he was when he committed the crime that sent him there.

David Daniels, a trained linguist conversant in Greek and Hebrew, had just read Gail Riplinger's book New Age Bible Versions.

What happened when a Christian linguist saw why he could trust the King James Bible.

Would you rather your friends read a Bible that God has clearly blessed, or one He has clearly cursed?

If you're not really sure what the Bible teaches (because there are so many translations), why change your life based upon it?

Video transcript - Can we only understand the Bible with the help of scholars? But they can't even agree on what the Bible says!

Here, excerpted from "The Answer Book" on Bible translations by Dr. Samuel Gipp, is an interesting and thought-provoking approach to this question.

Why were the words he was reading different than the ones his pastor was saying?

The new version, called "Today's NIV" or TNIV for short, is supposedly a "gender-accurate" version of the NIV Bible.

"We, today, are living at a time when the attacks upon Jesus Christ find no equal in history..."

Can just one Greek letter change the gospel from God-centered to man-centered? You are about to find out.

Enough doctrinal changes have been made to God's Word that the Pope can now urge his people to read the 'Bible.'

Gail Riplinger's new book, "Which Bible Is God's Word?" contains answers to common questions concerning modern versions and translations.

Specific reasons why we know this refers to Satan.

No, it's not true. The words in their widest use simply refer to a witch or a sorcerer. Here's why.

Can God be pleased when we dare to scorn the Bible that proved its power during 400 years of expansion of the Kingdom of God?

Video transcript - Should we dump the King James Bible because of "archaic words", or should we just learn them?

Examines the two streams of Bible text, and how to choose the right one.

The 100-year war over which text is really God's Word. From 'Understandable History of the Bible' by Samuel C. Gipp

The next time you open your Bible, consider what you hold. Do you know that you hold God’s words perfectly preserved and passed down? Words that were translated through the tireless diligence of the best scholars using the most well-preserved manuscripts? Modern-day publishers and scholars have run a smear campaign against the KJV Bible by claiming their translations to be superior. They state that the KJV is impossible to understand and modern translations are needed.

Do you want to know exactly what the instructions say, or will you trust the second translator's ability to understand the author's intent and not lead you astray?

Transcript from a video interview between Jack McElroy and David W. Daniels on the problems with the Geneva Bible.

King James was faced with a conflict. The Puritans wanted a new, correct Bible. But the Anglican church was quite happy with their Bishops' Bible. James had an idea. The churches of the opposing groups would select their best scholars to work together to agree on a single text. That way neither group could write its own viewpoint into the translation. If it tried, the opposing group would shoot it down. What a brilliant way to force the translators to ignore their personal opinions and to just translate precisely, meaning for meaning, nothing added.

The detailed system used to prevent anyone from imposing his own opinion upon the translation. From "Answers To Your Bible Version Questions" by David W. Daniels.

Here is the sworn enemy who made the accusation, and why.

Video transcript - An answer to the claims that King James was a homosexual.

The Answer Book, was written by Dr. Samuel Gipp in response to the dozens of questions used by critics of the King James Bible.

They were Bible believers from both Anglican and Puritan churches. From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp copyright 1989. Reproduced by permisson.

Just because you don't kow the answer doesn't mean there isn't one. We have to trust that God preserved His Word just the way He wanted it. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp.

If people can't understand the King James, isn't it better to have them read the NIV over nothing at all?

Isn't the 21st Century King James Bible supposed to be an exact reprint of the original 1611 version but with archaic words replaced for the closest modern word? Can it be trusted?

From 'The Answer Book' by Samuel Gipp.

If God wrote only one Book, what's the problem with trusting and submitting to that one Book?

Doesn't it just modernize the words of the King James Bible? Why should I read the King James and not the helpful New King James?

Many people in our congregations are impressed with preachers who refer to the Greek or Hebrew in their sermons.

There are two kinds of manuscripts...Accurate and corrupted.

It was In the available Antiochian manuscripts. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel C. Gipp.

The series of English Bibles that led up to the translation of the King James Version. How we can recognize God's endorsement of the KJV.

Researches found the KJV still used by the majority of those who actually read their Bibles.

So which words are Jesus` words? Every single word of the Bible! The Bible is God`s words to us.

In spite of the overwhelming evidence in Scripture of the outcome of David's dramatic defeat of Goliath, The New International Version, 1984 US edition, couldn't get it right.

Our thanks to Rev. D.A. Waite, who gives us this simple explanation in his book, Defending the King James Bible.

The purpose of translating the King James Bible was to give the Scriptures to the common man. From "The Answer Book" by Samuel Gipp.

Here are the highly qualified translators of the King James Bible.

The accounts of Jesus' lineage in Matthew and Luke are different. Here's why this is not a contradiction.

The italics usually are a simple way of telling us when the word in English is not in the Hebrew or the Greek.

Why is it that most bible versions (non-KJV) either omit Mark 16:9-20 or they have footnotes about alternative endings?

In almost every language but Modern English, people knew whether the speaker was addressing one person or many.

The fact is that the word "corn" comes from a word, meaning "grain" and related to "kernel."

The translators of the KJV used the term "Jehovah" only under strict circumstances, and for good reason.

Author gives three examples of why he will stay with his tried-and-true King James Bible.

Here are the clear reasons for the difference.

Despite stories to the contrary, King James, in no uncertain terms, clearly authorized the translation of the Bible that now bears his name.

Scripture memorization is a lost art.

Video transcript - Why did God bless an English translation? What about other languages?

Passover is not the correct translation of pascha in this single New Testament passage.

Here's how Luke tells us that any manuscript missing the bodily ascension of Jesus is a fraud.

If Jack would have given in to pressure and decided to use modern versions, some of his tracts might have been quite different than what we have today.