Could the Bible be declared an instrument of persecution? Under a new bill just
signed into law by President Clinton the following scenario seems to now be
A missionary in a foreign country leads a young person to Christ and gives him a
Bible. His parents are orthodox Jews. They complain to their government that the
missionary is persecuting their family.
That government demands that the missionary's home government recall the
missionary, arrest and try him for violation of this law which prohibits the
exportation of "persecution facilitating products or services."
Sound far fetched? Possibly, but this new law, known as the Freedom From Religious
Persecution Act provides for an Office of Religious Persecution Monitoring with
a director appointed by the president. He is responsible to evaluate religious
persecution world wide and designate countries or regions which carry out
persecution. He is to draw up a list of "persecution facilitating products,
goods, and services" which are used in "carrying out acts of religious
Granted, the law defines religious persecution primarily in terms of torture,
murder or other violent acts. But it is based on a religious freedom definition
which permits freedom of thought, conscience, worship, and even freedom to change
one's religion. But it does not include freedom to "proselytize," — do soul
winning or witnessing.
Under this definition, the young man in the example above would be free to change
his religion, but the missionary could be charged for persecution because he
"proselytized" the man. The missionary's activities could be construed as a
"persecution facilitating service" and the product used, the Bible, as a
"persecution facilitating product."
Is it not possible that this law lays the groundwork for banning all soul winning
literature as persecution facilitating products and the sending of missionaries as
a form of persecution facilitating services?
During the Gulf War, U.S. soldiers were restricted from bringing in gospel
literature and even Bibles to Muslim Saudi Arabia where they were stationed.
If a Muslim country simply declares that Christian literature constitutes a threat
to the religion of their people, then it could possibly be defined as a form of
persecution and they could demand that U.S. citizens or organizations be prosecuted
under section 7 of this Act.
Although the Act has been made law, your congressman or senator should be made
aware of your concern. Bit by bit, our freedom to witness and distribute literature
is being eroded. We must resist while we can.