People argued that the last part of the Gospel of Mark should be removed since it’s not in miniscule 2427, believed to be the oldest. Then scientific evidence proved it was a hoax.

If you trust text critics, the original gospel had no bodily resurrection! So why trust them?

The vast majority of Bible manuscripts support the King James, except for the two corrupted ones used to change modern Bibles.

The Sinaitucus has several writers and correctors, apocryphal writings, and contradictions. How do you decide which parts to accept as Scripture, and which parts to reject?

The document explores the origins of the Catholic Church's authority, focusing on the Donation of Constantine, a forged document from the 4th century, and the Sinaiticus manuscript, alleged to be a modern forgery. It critiques the Church's historical and modern influences on political and religious domains.

Tischendorf's story about finding Codex Sinaiticus in a wastebasket is really false. Here is why.

As it became clear that modern Bibles remove or change many verses, it begs the question: is this intentional? Is it a conspiracy to change the Bible? All it took was careful research to find the truth!

Why not make a Bible out of just the 'world's oldest Bible' Codex Sinaiticus? Here's why you haven’t, and probably never will, see one.